The team who created this Mashup all work at Murdoch University Library; we are not all coders, mathematicians, geocachers, sustainability experts nor are we dieticians.
Walter's Walk-a meter is named in honour of Sir Walter Murdoch (1874-1970) after whom the Murdoch University is named. He was famous for his intelligence, wit and humanity and the fact that he was a keen walker. Living in the age before the internet Sir Walter might have been amused by the liberty taken here.
Read more about Sir Walter here http://www.murdoch.edu.au/vco/secretariat/records/people/sirwaltermurdoch.html
We made this as an example of what you could do with some data in a mashup. We are not 100% certain that the data is correct, and assumptions and rounding were made with the calculations and there was something the math gurus were saying about curvatures of the earth and longitude and approximations and the earth bulging, but I didn't get it, though in a nutshell it basically it meant its not exact.
We got most of the math and effects from here:
- http://www.curvycorners.net/ for the rounded corner of the options part
- http://script.aculo.us/ for effects and sliders (say the show/hide)
- http://wikimedia.org to find the internet, options and the search icons
- http://maps.google.com for the map :P It's Google Map API Version 3 (with sensor for GPS device)
- http://24ways.org/2007/supersleight-transparent-png-in-ie6 for the trick to make sure that all of our png files are displayed correctly
With the routes we take, they are as the crow flies and do not take into account things like topography or things in your way like trees, rivers or big buildings like parliament house.
This will skew things like the CO2 produced and whether you really could cycle at 20km an hour for 40 km, uphill, in the wind and quite possibly through a river.
We did get the CO2 produced data from here: http://www.carpages.co.uk/co2/
We had to average them out a bit and they are based on UK vehicles, so before we get a letter from GMH, you're right, your car probably does better than that at CO2 emissions.
The same thing goes with the calories burned, we got the formula from an article, there is probably someone (and we hope in the name of academic discussion there is) that disagrees with the whole thing.
You can see where we got it from here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10993420
The carbon footprint data we got from here: http://timeforchange.org/what-is-a-carbon-footprint-definition
I can't imagine someone won't disagree with that at some point.
We are also a bit limited to what data we had available, so if your nearest public toilet is 5000km away, speak to your local government official and get them to jump on board to get more data out there.
In short, we have done our best, but there are definitely some things that ensure that this could only be used as a rough guide and not for things like precision drilling and of course consult your doctor about weight loss, they are the experts, we just made a mashup.
Other attributions:
- Banner: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fchouse/2611238650/ Carlo Nicora, "Green" June 25, 2008 via Flickr, Creative Commons Attribution.
- Modified Circle Code available: http://jerschneid.blogspot.com/2008/12/simple-way-to-draw-circle-with-google.html
- Modified Distance Code available: http://snipplr.com/view/2531/calculate-the-distance-between-two-coordinates-latitude-longitude/
- Other Mathematical Data from: http://www.peertrainer.com/LoungeCommunityThread.aspx?ForumID=1&ThreadID=48138 (calories burned by exercise)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metabolic_equivalent (MET for a leisurely stroll)










